And you will find my reply to Greg’s response there as well. What follows will only make sense if you go there first.
So, Greg, is it your *hope* that the signs of movement represent an interest in returning to traditional marriage, or can you analytically determine they are something more than evidence of a dead-cat bounce? And can we reasonably say it is not similar to liberal lionization of Ronald Reagan, now that he is safely gone and no longer able to hurt them?
And you will find my reply to Greg’s response there as well. What follows will only make sense if you go there first.
So, Greg, is it your *hope* that the signs of movement represent an interest in returning to traditional marriage, or can you analytically determine they are something more than evidence of a dead-cat bounce? And can we reasonably say it is not similar to liberal lionization of Ronald Reagan, now that he is safely gone and no longer able to hurt them?
Reply here.
Pingback: Is Marriage Dead? Let’s Quibble Over Methodology! | Hang Together